New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
update system-validators to v1.4.0 #98977
Conversation
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
/milestone v1.21 |
/sig node cluster-lifecycle |
/priority important-soon |
Will we support 20.10 docker in 1.21? https://endoflife.software/applications/virtualization/docker-daemon We may do it before 1.22 release. |
yep, i was mostly waiting to see if sig node wish to make any modifications to system-validators in 1.21. |
b111337
to
59d3327
Compare
/test pull-kubernetes-dependencies |
59d3327
to
7140ad7
Compare
Includes a Docker bump to 20.10.
7140ad7
to
b03418c
Compare
i ran this again:
and now the diff does not include the staging / kubectl changes. |
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ dependencies: | |||
|
|||
# Docker | |||
- name: "docker" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This entry seems odd / misleading.
- it's only matching one file
- it's not really a dependency?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's only matching one file
i guess there are not other places to track this.
it's not really a dependency?
same goes for "crictl" and "cni".
the original idea was to have a machine readable file that can be used by maintainers and users to track what is the latest version of component X that k8s supports. k8s may also depend on component X.
based on that, maybe dependecies.yaml
is not the right name.
but renaming it is a breaking change to the same users.
alternatively all those components that k8s actually does not depend on can be removed.
which is also a breaking change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess, we do actually require a minimum docker version for other reasons (building) that we ought to be tracking but that's a separate concern, and this will go away anyhow when dockershim goes away.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
and this will go away anyhow when dockershim goes away.
instead i recall discussions to add containerd in this file too, to let users know what is the latest version we are testing.
cc @dims
@neolit123: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/lgtm |
/assign @liggitt |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, liggitt, neolit123 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
after kubernetes/system-validators#23 merged.
the system-validator library was tagged with v1.4.0 to support Docker 20.10.
e2e tests in Kops are already testing this version of Docker:
https://github.com/kubernetes/kops/search?p=2&q=%2220.10%22
https://storage.googleapis.com/kubernetes-jenkins/logs/e2e-kops-grid-calico-flatcar-k20-ko20-docker/1365142370928037888/build-log.txt
and Docker 19.03 will be EOLed in July:
https://endoflife.software/applications/virtualization/docker-daemon
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: