Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Promote Cinder topology labels to GA #99719

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 4, 2021
Merged

Promote Cinder topology labels to GA #99719

merged 1 commit into from Mar 4, 2021

Conversation

jsafrane
Copy link
Member

@jsafrane jsafrane commented Mar 3, 2021

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Use GA topology labels in in-tree Cinder volume plugin.

[ACTION REQUIRED] Newly provisioned PVs by OpenStack Cinder plugin will no longer use the deprecated "failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone" and "failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region" labels. It will use "topology.kubernetes.io/zone" and "topology.kubernetes.io/region" labels instead.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

cc @Jiawei0227

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-action-required Denotes a PR that introduces potentially breaking changes that require user action. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 3, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jsafrane: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 3, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Mar 3, 2021
@jsafrane jsafrane mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2021
Closed
@Jiawei0227
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 3, 2021
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 3, 2021

/assign @cheftako @andrewsykim

@cheftako
Copy link
Member

cheftako commented Mar 3, 2021

We have restrictions against allowing any new feature work in legacy cloud providers as of the v1.21 release. However the work in the openstack package does not appear to be new feature work but a switch to the already approved GA topology labels.
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cheftako, jsafrane

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 3, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

/retest
This bot automatically retries jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs (send feedback to fejta).

Review the full test history for this PR.

Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold cancel
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 4, 2021

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 4, 2021
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 4, 2021

( sorry for the random holds! trying to fight the tide pool )

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit cdd80af into kubernetes:master Mar 4, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.21 milestone Mar 4, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@anguslees anguslees Awaiting requested review from anguslees

@FengyunPan2 FengyunPan2 Awaiting requested review from FengyunPan2

Assignees

@cheftako cheftako

@Jiawei0227 Jiawei0227

@andrewsykim andrewsykim

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/cloudprovider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note-action-required Denotes a PR that introduces potentially breaking changes that require user action. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.21
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
7 participants
@jsafrane @k8s-ci-robot @Jiawei0227 @dims @cheftako @fejta-bot @andrewsykim