Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove CSINodeInfo feature gate #96561

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 5, 2021

Conversation

ialidzhikov
Copy link
Contributor

@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov commented Nov 13, 2020

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/sig storage

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

The `CSINodeInfo` feature gate that is GA since v1.17 is unconditionally enabled, and can no longer be specified via the `--feature-gates` argument.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Nov 13, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ialidzhikov: This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 13, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ialidzhikov. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Nov 13, 2020
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Nov 14, 2020

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 14, 2020
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Nov 14, 2020

/assign @deads2k @Huang-Wei @vladimirvivien

@Huang-Wei
Copy link
Member

/approve
on scheduling side.

@leilajal
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-sig api-machinery

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. label Nov 17, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 9, 2020
Signed-off-by: ialidzhikov <i.alidjikov@gmail.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Dec 10, 2020
@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @verult

@vladimirvivien vladimirvivien removed their assignment Dec 10, 2020
@fedebongio
Copy link
Contributor

/remove-sig api-machinery

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the sig/api-machinery Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG API Machinery. label Dec 10, 2020
@msau42
Copy link
Member

msau42 commented Dec 11, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 11, 2020
@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Jan 4, 2021

/approve
/assign @liggitt

@liggitt liggitt added the release-note-action-required Denotes a PR that introduces potentially breaking changes that require user action. label Jan 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the release-note-action-required Denotes a PR that introduces potentially breaking changes that require user action. label Jan 5, 2021
@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Jan 5, 2021

/priority backlog
/triage accept
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@liggitt: The label(s) triage/accept cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them

In response to this:

/priority backlog
/triage accept
/lgtm
/approve

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dims, Huang-Wei, ialidzhikov, liggitt, msau42

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 5, 2021
@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test pull-kubernetes-bazel-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 07bd985 into kubernetes:master Jan 5, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.21 milestone Jan 5, 2021
@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov deleted the cleanup/csi-node-info branch January 9, 2021 19:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/apps Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Apps. sig/auth Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Auth. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. sig/storage Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Storage. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

10 participants