New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move pkg/kubelet/apis to k8s.io/kubelet/pkg/apis #98931
Move pkg/kubelet/apis to k8s.io/kubelet/pkg/apis #98931
Conversation
Hi @michaelbeaumont. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
looks like a well contained change (basically move well_known_labels.go over and fix references). LGTM from a code-org perspective. /approve |
/ok-to-test |
/triage accepted |
5797bca
to
a5a6762
Compare
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
This is nice. |
This looks reasonable to me. As an aside, the old /lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dims, liggitt, michaelbeaumont The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
6 similar comments
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
/retest Review the full test history for this PR. Silence the bot with an |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
/area code-organization
What this PR does / why we need it:
At the moment, in order to programmatically validate which labels kubelet will accept if provided through
--node-labels
, the user needs to import from k8s.io/kubernetes, which is not intended for consumption as a module.Resurrects #92527 which went stale without a resolution (#92527 (comment))
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: