New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
kube-controller-manager: properly check generic ephemeral volume feature #104913
kube-controller-manager: properly check generic ephemeral volume feature #104913
Conversation
Due to a cut-and-paste error in the original implementation in Kubernetes 1.19, support for generic ephemeral inline volumes in the PVC protection controller was incorrectly tied to the "storage object in use" feature gate.
/priority important-soon |
/lgtm |
/cc @deads2k to take a look |
@fedebongio: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: to, take, a, look. Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: deads2k, pohly The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…3-origin-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of #104913: kube-controller-manager: properly check generic ephemeral
…3-origin-release-1.21 Automated cherry pick of #104913: kube-controller-manager: properly check generic ephemeral
…3-origin-release-1.22 Automated cherry pick of #104913: kube-controller-manager: properly check generic ephemeral
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Due to a cut-and-paste error in the original implementation in Kubernetes 1.19,
support for generic ephemeral inline volumes in the PVC protection controller
was incorrectly tied to the "storage object in use" feature gate.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Found by @ikeeip when removing the StorageObjectInUseProtection feature gate (#104903 (comment)).
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?